May 7, 2020
Take – U.S., 2007
There is a twist toward the end of Charles Oliver’s 2007
film Take that changes your
perception of everything that has preceded it. I do not wish to reveal it;
however, I was surprised how powerful the revelation was and how it made complete
sense from both a personal and psychological perspective. In a way, it is a
necessity, a form of both emotional self-torment and relief that reflects one
of the normal functions of the human psyche – the need to believe the best of
people we don’t know if only to give ourselves a way of letting go.
Take primarily follows
two characters, Ana (Minnie Driver) and Saul (Jeremy Renner), on two different
days in time. One is the beginning of their tragic interaction, the other the
last, perhaps making it one of closure, whatever that means. We meet these two
characters at a jail; one is on the inside; the other on the outside. The woman
is on the phone with her husband, who is notably absent on what appears to be
an important day. A shot of the kind of chair associated with lethal injections
hints at the finality of what is about to transpire. In an emotionally
devastating shot, we see a close-up of Saul’s lost stare and as the camera pans
back, we see his full devastating expression. He doesn’t speak; in truth, he
doesn’t need to. This is the face of a man full of remorse.
The film then flashes back – back to the woman’s trek to the
jail, back to the young man’s final conversations with his best friend, who
just happens to be a minister. Spliced into these flashbacks are scenes from
another day years earlier. We see that Ana worked as a cleaning lady and that
Saul was an employee of a mini-storage facility. We soon see that each of them
was facing extreme challenges. Ana was trying to raise a son whose teacher and
principal had given up on him; Saul had been informed that he had twenty-four hours
to repay a gambling debt. They didn’t know each other; there was no reason to
think they ever would. However, a snippet of a flashback early on hints at the
utter devastation that their eventual crossed paths will have on their lives.
Some of what transpires is unfortunately par for the course.
After all, how many movies about this kind contain scenes in which a religious figure
mentions God only for the condemned man to reject the efforts to save his soul?
Take doesn’t break any new ground in
these scenes, but there is at least genuineness to them. A minister would
likely argue for finding peace and accepting love before one meets his maker, and
a man like Saul would probably be unreceptive to them, angry at the perceived
irrationality of such sentiments. The film also makes the unfortunate choice of
visually showing a series of conversations that are likely happening in Ana’s
head, either as a means of coping with loss or as a possibly indicator of a
mild form of madness. Showing us the conversation weakens those two
possibilities, turning talking to someone who’s not actually there into just another
common form of self-therapy A bolder film would have found a more realistic way
of conveying her continued sorrow without having to rely of such a numbing narrative
technique.
The film is much better when it devotes time to the
circumstances that led to their eventual meeting. Ana is presented to us as the
kind of self-sacrificing mother we so often admire in society – she works
menial jobs, while raising a son whom society is almost certain to label as having
either ADHD or mental challenges. Her husband, a high school teacher, seems to
be a good man; he’s just not around enough. In Saul’s scenes, we witness a
young man who seems to have decided that he’s destined for something other than
normality. He’s wrong, of course, but that way of thinking has put him on an
extremely destructive course and mixed him with entirely the wrong crowd. It
has also put his life in danger, hence, his eventual desperate actions.
I felt for these characters. I saw the nobility in Ana’s
path, and I detected a spark of decency in Saul’s troubled soul. In a perfect
world, Ana’s choices would have resulted in a moment of triumph, as her son
walked on stage to collect his diploma. There are many Anas out there - people
who quietly live their lives as best as they can, who give their all so that
someone else can eventually reach his or her potential. And there are numerous
Sauls – individuals who are not so much evil as lost on a downward moral spiral
that finds them less in control of their actions than they’d like to think they
are. This is, of course, by design, a result of a characteristic
common in all of us, without which, we’d truly be lost.
As Ana, Minnie Driver gives an unforgettable performance,
taking us on a whirlwind of emotions – from Ana’s cheerful, determined demeanor
before the tragedy, to the heart-wrenching incident at the film’s core, and
finally to the inspiring resolve that she finds in the film’s closing moments.
This is one I’ll remember for a while. Jeremy Renner is equally memorable. He takes
us on a one-way descent to despair and desperation, while never letting us completely
lose sight of the Saul’s humanity. Had the film been more successful, I have no
doubt that at least one of them would have been in consideration for an Oscar. Take is not an easy film to watch – no film
with this subject matter is – but it is thought-provoking and ultimately
cathartic. I hope more people discover it. (on DVD)
3 stars
No comments:
Post a Comment