September 3, 2020
Downhill – UK, 1927

Some
time later – the film does not specify exactly how much – the two buddies are
summoned by their headmaster, who utters those ominous words referenced above.
Yet let’s stop and ponder that for a moment. Why both of them? At this point,
the audience has no reason to question this, but as events unfold, the quandary
grows, and the answer becomes increasingly incredulous. For in the Headmaster’s
office is the aforementioned young lady, and she has indeed brought a charge.
She then precedes to spell out the events of that frustrating night, events
that I should remind you the audience saw in real time not five minutes
earlier. The Headmaster hangs on her every word, responding with heartfelt
empathy and a stern look at the two young men in his care. And then he
asks…Which boy was it?
So,
let us get this straight. The young lady went to the Headmaster and said she
had a complaint about one of his students. The Headmaster didn’t ask what the
complaint was or who she was leveling a complaint against. He just brought her
in, summoned two possible offenders, and then asked her to tell her side of the
story? Apparently so. I watched this scene twice, the second time after I’d
finished the film, and it made even less sense the second time around.
Now
in the days of silent film, audiences would often play a game. They would try
to read the performers’ lips to see if what they said during filming matched
either the intertitles or the plot. Often it didn’t. Not being a lip-reader
myself, I could not tell just what words the young lady used when hurling her
accusation, but if we are to believe what Hitchcock chose to show in the flashbacks,
it involved dancing, an innocent exchange of money made scandalous, and the
following get-together. Then, in another head-scratching moment, the Headmaster
demands to know just whom she is leveling charges toward. She points to Roddy.
She later mentions that he is from a rich family and says that they’ve go to
“see me through this.” Whether this means childbirth or an abortion is
not made clear. And the character doesn’t stick around to explain herself. Her
tearful accusation is the last time we see her in the flesh.
So,
Downhill is the tale of an innocent
man whose future is ruined by an evil, conniving woman with the help of a
friend whose first impulse is to protect himself. Well, surely this has been a
learning experience for Roddy, and he should now be equipped with the tools to
protect himself from further financial predators. Ah, but that would require
logic and perspective, two qualities that screenwriter Eliot Stannard
apparently decided Roddy did not have. Consequently, we soon find him
attempting to woo a famous stage actress (Isabel Jeans) who just happens to
have a sugar-daddy who’s in the habit of spoiling her rotten. The jewels, the
perfume, the fur coats, the older man – all of these things should have set off
alarm bells, especially someone who’d previously been disowned by his father as
a result of a rather immoral young lady. Alas, Roddy isn’t thinking with his
head; he’s following his…well, I’m not exactly sure what he’s following, but
whatever it is, it puts him on another path toward poverty. Poor guy. He just
can’t seem to find a decent woman.
I
know what you’re thinking. Soon he will.
He just has to. I get this notion. This is Hitchcock after all, and almost
all of his movies end with the budding of love or a romantic wedding. And truth
be told, many of Hitchcock’s early movies had immensely sympathetic female
characters. This, however, is not one of them. Downhill takes place in a world of women each after either the
all-mighty dollar or unearned adulation, and the Great Depression hasn’t even
started yet. Had the film been made just a year later, it might have been
possible to see it as a commentary on the moral compromises people make during
hard times. Instead, it comes across as more than a
little sexist. No wonder Criterion offered it as a Special Feature: It’s hard
to see anyone but the most die hard Hitchcock fans having any interest in it. (included
on the Criterion Collection’s release of The
Lodger)
2
stars
No comments:
Post a Comment