August 9, 2012
China Gate –
China, 2011
If the figure quoted in Wang Yang’s fascinating documentary China Gate is accurate, almost 300,000
students in the area surrounding Huining High School take the university entrance exam in China each year (nationally, the number tops nine million), and of those
300,000, just 70,000 achieve a score that qualifies them for entrance into
China’s prestigious universities. Put another way, about 76% of students who
take the test fail. 76%. It’s a distressing figure. And just what awaits some
of those lucky students who actually pass the test? A college education paid
for through loans, the mortgaging of what little land a family has, and the
life savings of relatives who have little chance of ever saving up that much
again. It hardly seems worth it.
Yet try telling that to the young, wide-eyes students we are
introduced to in the documentary. Each of them possesses the kind of self-confidence
and determination that all youth should have. In one scene, the students are
encouraged to stand up and share their reasons for wanting to go on to college.
For some, the motivation is to help their families; for others, it’s the chance
to see new places and have a more exciting life. The students are implored to
keep pushing themselves, for, as their teacher tells them, the key to their
success is effort, not wisdom.
And effort is what the students give. Whether it’s healthy
or not is another matter. The film begins with the unsettling sight of students
at their desks loudly reciting information out loud, their desks stacked
haphazardly with every kind of reading material you can imagine, sans smart
phones, computers or iPads. Those devices don’t seem to have reached this far
into the countryside. Some of the students rock back and forth incessantly as
they read aloud. The theory behind it seems to be that the constant repetition
and vocalization will help the information stick in their heads. One of the
film’s most memorable scenes occurs on the school playground, where instead of joyful
chatter and competitive games of basketball, students walk around, books in
hand, reciting whatever information is on the agenda to be learned that day.
The students we meet are from Yao Ping Village, a
poverty-stricken village near Fujian, China. In one scene, Wang Yang turns his
camera away from the students to show viewers the dry barren land that these
children have grown up in. It appears that time and progress has completely
forgotten this part of China. In one of his books, Thomas Friedman talks about
the “skyline test.” According to him, if you can look into the distance and not
see the skyline through the tall skyscrapers, banks, and apartment buildings,
you know you are in a developed or developing area. Yao Ping Village,
unfortunately, does not pass this test. In fact, only one area of Yao Ping has
a suburb-like appearance to it, the area surrounding the school, where
apparently the students live during the month leading up to the exam. Many
parents stop farming and move closer to the school as well, hoping to be able
to help their children succeed. For many of them, this means cooking for their
children In one of the most eye-catching scenes, Wang Yang shows us pile upon
pile of what first appears to be rubbish. On closer inspection, we see that they
are bags filled with food, and each one has a student’s name on it. One of them
reads, “Food for the week.”
The heart of the film is of course the students. There’s
seventeen-year-old Yang Huibing, who believes that “all the best things are in
the city” and worries that even if he passes the test, his family won’t have
the means to send him to a university. His mother assures him that they can
take out a loan. Then there’s a young lady named Yao Xun, who is conflicted
about the possibility of leaving home. Wisely, the film does not restrict
itself to high school students. Yang also journeys to Beijing and Shanghai to
talk to recent graduates about their experiences after graduation. The most
memorable of these individuals is Wang Xiaozhi, who lives in Tang Jialing, an
apartment complex that he refers to as a “slum-like place.” It’s not hard to
see why. His experiences, as well as those of another recent grad named Ma
Long, demonstrates just how hard it can be to make a living in Beijing.
Not everything in the film works as well as it should. An
interview with a music tutor in Shanghai goes nowhere, and despite being
genuinely nice people, no one associated with Huining High School comes off as
well as they should. The reasons for this is that all viewers see them doing is
imploring students to study hard, give 100%, and to keep going. We don’t see
them actually teaching the students anything. Maybe this is what they wanted
the camera to capture them doing, but it does leave one to wonder just how much
“teaching” is going on. Also, the film is divided into segments that are
introduced by the Chinese characters for such things as adventure, family, and blessing. They seemed unnecessary to me,
but I may not have the right background to understand their connection to the
people in the film or their experiences.
However, the film as a whole works wonderfully. We feel for
the characters Yang interviews and wish them better futures than their
presents. Yang also displays a willingness to let the characters speak for
themselves, and it gives the film a great deal of authenticity. Kudos should
also be given to David Braid, whose piano score perfectly captures the strain,
the futility, and the beauty of what is unfolding on the screen. At one point
in the film, we see the students climb to what to them must feel like the top
of the world. They smile, laugh, and cheer at being in such a place. It is a
rare moment of joy at a time in their lives that is filled with so much stress.
They all deserve to succeed on their exams. Unfortunately, only 23% of them
likely will. (on DVD in Region 3)
3 and a half stars
*China Gate is in
Mandarin and a local dialect with English subtitles.
No comments:
Post a Comment